Aftonbladet ökar upplaga på söndagar!

Vem bryr sig? Din självglorifiering är smaklös.

Hahaha, så jävla underhållande med alla människor som läser saker de inte bryr sig om. Din idioti och smaklöshet finner inga gränser, Guttaperka.

En intressant fråga som dyker upp nu efter er publicering av Mias bevis i Gömda-debatten är om ni tänkt publicera intervju med Mia nu när hon,enligt uppgift,vandrar omkring i det Oxelösund som hon, i er intervju, hävdade att hon aldrig skulle kunna återvända till efter att hennes identitet "avslöjats"... Borde inte saker läggas till rätta snart? kanske borde båda sidor fått komma till tals?
Aftonbladet har,trots sina upplagor, förlorat mycket i det lilla förtroendet ni haft.

AFTONBLADET VÅGAR STICKA UT HAKAN!
****************************************************
Behövs i Ankdammen, Sverige.

* CHRISTER KYREUS, etiker-debattör

Dear Mr. Jan Helin, editor of Aftonbladet,
I'm very much aware to the fact that you are a busy man but I would appreciate it dearly if you spend few moments of your time for these words I wish to express.

The Freedom of Speech is a segment of the right of people for Personal Freedom which has an intrinsic value in the common and the leading universal moral. The right for Personal Freedom posts the basic value of "live and let live" as the first value that law and morality are being built on. This point is offering the starting point of all other rights and obligations in a way that "one can fulfill all his/her wishes as long as he/she does not prevent from other to fulfill his/her wishes".
The Freedom of the Press, as a segment of the Freedom of Speech, is destined to act as the guardian of individuals' rights from possible offences of the collective (the State for ex.) and other influential organizations, when publishing torts and burning them in peoples' consciousness so they could defend their rights and, also causing the offender to be deterred and to cease continuation of offence. In other words, strengthen the rights of the individual while laying obligations on the collective. None the less, the media itself can be caught as a collective force itself, depending on its status, power and means, potential of influence and the amount of exposure it has in the public. So, the stronger the media-body is, the bigger the obligations it has, similar to other governmental or private organizations. Many will agree to the saying that the obligation laying on the internal minister of Belgium (for ex.) while giving a statement is not smaller than the obligation laying on CNN while airing a major story. On both bodies lay heavy obligations of avoiding offending individuals' rights. Sometimes, the obligation of the press to reveal torts is in collision with the obligation to avoid offending one's right for a good name and personal security. The way to overcome this obstacle is for journalists to publish "facts" (different than "opinions") when they are based on solid and reliable sources. The higher the concern of offending individual's rights, the bigger the obligation to clarify the story.
When "Aftonbladet", the media giant known for its vast distribution in Scandinavia, is publishing a story on the front page it is difficult to call it "an opinion" rather than "a news story". I'm guessing that all common persons will agree to the assumption that any newspaper or news broadcast that starts with a certain article or a story, is called "news" – informing the public on a certain issue. In this case, informing the public of very possible actions in which the IDF is involved actively in murdering people for their organs. "Aftonbladet" published a big story without any proper verification while offending heavily individuals' rights.
I find myself agreeing with the Swedish foreign minister that he cannot comment on the story for being published by a private newspaper. None the less, for the size and power of the media giant I claim "Aftonbladet" has "sinned" four times. First, publishing a front-page story without verifying and validating the facts. Second, not minimizing the damage of the offence and even magnifying it by accusing the state and public of Israel by being non-democratic. Third, the news paper did not act by the obligations of fairness and objectivity that lay on it and fourth, by using the cover of Swedish-liberal-democracy to act in a non-democratic way of offending and dehumanizing millions of people for their Israeli citizenship.
As a private Israeli civilian and citizen, I do not agree with some comments of many of the lawmakers of my country. I even suspect that some of them are guilty of having a will to empower their image in the eyes of their voters by "showing a muscle". On the other hand, so far, the comments of the newspaper's heads do not hold any weight for they are only dealing with sidelines (Liberman's comments) and not the centre (the story, the motive for its publishment and the outcome).
I can't express much more than my disappointment and even great disappointment of the heads of the newspaper which is positioned in a liberal and democratic society that the obligations for fairness, caution, objectivity and responsibility lay on it strongly for its great status in the free world.

You are most welcome to reply,

Benjamin Nashpitz, Jerusalem.

Prasselmedia och speciellt värstingen i klassen, Aftonbladet, borde beläggas med extra CO2 skatt för alla osanningar som ni publicerar på papper och distribuerar utan att skämmas.

Miljöbovar, sanningsosägare, bedriver egen politisk agenda osv osv. Kan inte hitta något plus och den dag kvällstidningarna försvinnner ska miljörörelsen och sanningssägarna skåla!

AFTONBLADET! I Adam Kellers artikel står det att mannen fick ett skott rakt i hjärtat! Donald Boström säger att mannen var svårt skadad! Nu får ni ta och ge er! Det ändrar ju helt frågan angående organtransplantation. Vem har rätt? Det är ju skamligt att ni lägger upp totalt motstående påståenden utan att kolla upp detta.

Bedrövlig smörja. Förljugen "journalistik". dåliga yrkesmän.

Jag såg detta extra tydligt när ni kände er nödsakade att förfalska Jimmie Åkessons citat i Rubriksättningen av hans artikel i AB som sedermera användes som verktyg att slå i huvudet på Jimmie Å. Både av era PK-kollegor och i Tv-studions bakgrundvinjett samt resten av gammelmedia. Sedan dess har jag inte trott det ni skriver. Inte ett dugg

UncleBob